Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's 89.7 score. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is somewhat heavier and just a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little bit better screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a quite larger display, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a better pixel amount in each inch of screen. The Galaxy S10 Lite's storage capacity for apps and games is very similar to the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G one, they have a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB and equal internal storage.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S10 Lite, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S10 Lite. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy S10 Lite, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.