Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-06 | -- |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE's global score of 76. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has older 13 version while Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because it has a higher number of faster cores and 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S24 FE has a little more vivid display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a little lower quantity of pixels per inch of display, a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller screen.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because it has a 6 percent bigger battery size.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way more megapixels back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.