Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is way better than the Galaxy S7's general score of 79.5. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a a lot newer cellphone than the Galaxy S7, although it is thicker and much heavier. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy S7, because it has a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S7 has a brighter display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better amount of pixels in each display inch. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much higher video quality, a bigger back-facing camera sensor and a camera in the back with a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S7. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy S7, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.