Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is way better than Galaxy XCover 5's 78.1 score. Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is older and a lot heavier than the Galaxy XCover 5, it's body is still just a little thinner. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version and Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11 version.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a more vivid display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a way larger display and a much higher screen density.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has more memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.