Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having a general score of 98 against 77.6. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is thinner and just a little bit lighter than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, even though it was released many years before. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an extremely better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 6 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200, a little bigger display and a greater pixels quantity in each screen inch.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features better battery duration than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 23% greater battery size.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a camera in the back with a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution and a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.