Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.65 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 11.65, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's global score of 9.65. Although the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro were only released with a couple of months difference, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is just a bit heavier but thinner. Both phones we are comparing include the same Android 11 operating system.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a little higher display pixel density, a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a quite larger display.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a much larger sensor, a lot more mega pixels camera and a lot higher video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4050mAh.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more money than the Galaxy XCover Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
