Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Galaxy Z Flip, with a general score of 98 against 88.5. Although it's the best in our current comparison, we must tell that it's also somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. These phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version while Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12 version.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a processing unit that's very similar to the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G one, and although the Galaxy Z Flip has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a little better display pixels density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a little bit bigger display.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos, a way higher video definition and a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a bit more than the Galaxy Z Flip, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.