Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, getting a 98 score against 85.6. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11 version, giving you some nice extra features and performance improvements. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is older, thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a little more pixels per screen inch and a little bit larger screen. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 52% more battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs more money than Galaxy Z Flip 3, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.