Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 11.23 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1157.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 4.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is just a bit better than the Galaxy Z Fold 2, with a 11.65 score against 11.23. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is incredibly lighter but thicker than the Galaxy Z Fold 2, and both of them were released only 7 months apart. Both devices in this comparison review include the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should provide all the same operating system features.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 12 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 3200px resolution and a higher screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a camera with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is also a bargain compared to others.