Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, getting a score of 98 against 90.6. These devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has Android 11 version, giving some extra features and performance optimizations. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, but it is notably thicker and was released just 17 months before.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and Galaxy Z Fold 3 feature very similar CPUs, both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 14 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.