Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-06 | -- |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is slightly better than the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, getting a 98 score against 91.1. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version while Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has Android 14. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a notably thicker but a little bit lighter cellphone than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a way lower number of pixels in each display inch and a little lower 1968 x 2184px resolution, it also counts with a larger display. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lot less mega-pixels back facing camera, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.