Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-06-11 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.08 x 2.69 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is better than the Xperia 10 III's global score of 83.7. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and Xperia 10 III has Android 11 version, so it provides some nice extra features. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than Xperia 10 III, it must be told that it's also older, heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better screen than Xperia 10 III, because it has a bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a just a little greater amount of pixels in each display inch. Xperia 10 III counts with a little bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Xperia 10 III also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better processing power than Xperia 10 III, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better camera than Sony Xperia 10 III, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit superior battery duration than Xperia 10 III, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.