Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 87.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-10-12 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Blue and Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 848.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than the Sony Xperia 5 II's 87.2 score. Even though the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than Sony Xperia 5 II, we must note that it is also a way heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little bit better processing power than Xperia 5 II, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Xperia 5 II, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a little bit larger display and a quite higher display density. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much better photos and videos than Xperia 5 II, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photos and a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting images or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way higher video definition and a camera with a way better resolution.
The Xperia 5 II's storage capacity to install games and applications is very similar to Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's one, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features greater battery performance than Xperia 5 II, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot more expensive than the Xperia 5 II, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.