Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.18 x 2.95 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 508 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is a lot better than Xperia XA2 Plus's score of 78.6. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is newer and just a bit thinner than the Xperia XA2 Plus's, but it is also just a little bit heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has older 13 version and Xperia XA2 Plus has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit more vivid display than Xperia XA2 Plus, because it has a better screen pixels density, a larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little better hardware performance than Sony Xperia XA2 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a greater camera than Sony Xperia XA2 Plus, because it has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera, a lot higher video resolution, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior storage for games and applications than Xperia XA2 Plus, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much longer battery duration than Xperia XA2 Plus, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.