Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's global score of 79. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version and Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is newer and thinner, but incredibly heavier than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a little better performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xperia XZ2 Compact has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a way smaller screen, a much lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little bit worse screen density.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots way better photographs and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a much higher video resolution, a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality, a larger aperture to take better low light captures and video and a much better resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior storage to install applications and games than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 74 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.