Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium's score of 82.2. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is newer, a little bit lighter and much thinner than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a better display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2160 x 3840 resolution and a greater pixels count in each inch of screen.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little faster processing unit than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior camera than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much better video definition, a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality photographs and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs more than the Xperia XZ2 Premium, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.