Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Xperia XZs, with a 98 score against 77.2. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is much newer, but just a little thicker and notably heavier than Xperia XZs. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xperia XZs, because it has a lot better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, a just a little greater pixel density and a much bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes just a bit better photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality photos and videos, a way higher video definition, a lot higher resolution camera and a bigger camera aperture. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZs, because it has a 72 percent greater battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more money than Sony Xperia XZs, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.