Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, getting a global score of 98 against 81.4. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is newer, but heavier and thicker than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version while Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE have extremely similar screens, although the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a just a little lower pixel amount per screen inch, a little bit smaller screen and a much lower 1080 x 2340 resolution. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a really longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 63 percent more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and a same size back camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot higher video quality and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.