Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than Xiaomi Mi 9T, with a 98 score against 82.2. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Mi 9T, but it's somewhat heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a better display pixels density, a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution and a quite bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same sensor size and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much more mega pixels camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.