Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Blue, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Xiaomi Mi A3, having a 98 score against 79.2. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version and Xiaomi Mi A3 has Android 11, so it counts with a couple nice extra features. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is noticeably heavier and just a little thicker than the Xiaomi Mi A3.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a much higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a lot more pixels per inch of display and a bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much better video resolution, a larger back-facing camera sensor and a back camera with a much better resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with better battery life than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 24% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.