Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is a lot better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T's global score of 78.2. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older and heavier phone than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, but Samsung managed to build it a bit thinner anyway. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a greater number of pixels per inch in the screen, a bit bigger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have the same aperture and a 0.5 inches sensor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way better video definition. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much greater memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T has greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.