Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | -- |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, getting a 98 score against 82.2. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has Android 11 version, so it gives lots of additional features and increased performance. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, but it's heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a little bit lower 1440 x 3200 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a quite greater screen density. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes a lot better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 and Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G have quite similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.