Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | -- |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's global score of 86.1. Even being the best in this review, Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is a bit thicker and a little bit heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a little bit greater pixels number in each screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way higher video definition and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.