Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | -- |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's score of 77.1. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11 version. Even being the best we are comparing here, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a little sharper screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a just a bit lower screen density and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 2080 x 2400.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G and Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G both feature really similar batteries.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.