Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is way better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro's general score of 75.7. Even though Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, we must note that it is also a way older, heavier and somewhat thicker phone. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12 version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a screen that's just as good as the screen in Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit smaller display and a little worse pixels density. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro's battery duration is very similar to the battery lifetime in Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because although it has a way tinier camera sensor which gives a much lower image and video quality, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP, a bigger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations and a way better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.