Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | -- |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, with a overall score of 98 against 77.1. Both phones in this comparison review come with the same Android 13 operating system, so both should provide you identical OS features. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a really superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a bit lower screen pixel density, a lot worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit smaller display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro have incredibly similar batteries performance. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has a lot smaller camera sensor, a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and a back facing camera with a lot worse 108 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.