Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.06 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-02-22 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, having a 11.65 score against 9.06. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a much newer phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, but it's heavier and a little thicker. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a bigger screen and a greater pixel density. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro features just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures way better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light captures, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.