Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, getting a 98 score against 77.2. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is newer than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's, although it's heavier and just a little thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a quite bigger display, a greater screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features superior battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes greater photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a bigger aperture for better low-light images, a lot higher video quality, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor and a back camera with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.