Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, having a 98 score against 80.2. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is newer than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro's, but it's somewhat thicker and heavier. Both phones we compare here use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a quite larger display, a better number of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and the ZTE Axon 10 Pro both have incredibly similar CPUs, both have a 12 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features longer battery duration than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior camera than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a camera with lot more megapixels.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.