Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, getting a 98 score against 78.1. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version and ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has Android 11. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older, somewhat heavier and thicker phone than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little bit better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit sharper display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a greater amount of pixels per screen inch, a little bit bigger display and a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit longer battery performance than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4600mAh.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better camera than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photos or video in low light environments and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot more expensive than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.