Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is much better than Google Pixel 3 XL, with a overall score of 94.8 against 80.7. Galaxy S20's design has the same thickness than Google Pixel 3 XL, but it's somewhat lighter. The Galaxy S20 has a bit better processor than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a just a little better screen pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a much better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also counts with a way bigger sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality and a lot higher video definition.
Galaxy S20 features a much greater storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 features just a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 17 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy S20, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 3 XL, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.