Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is much better than the Google Pixel 4's 81.9 overall score. Although the Samsung Galaxy S20 and Google Pixel 4 were released with only 4 months difference, Samsung Galaxy S20's body is just a little bit heavier but also a little bit thinner than Google Pixel 4.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a little larger display, a greater display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
Galaxy S20 features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43% greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy S20 captures better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a lower resolution back camera and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a much larger sensor and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 4. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S20, else you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 4, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.