Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is much better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, with a score of 94.8 against 82.9. The Samsung Galaxy S20 design is a little thinner and lighter than the Google Pixel 4 XL, although both were released only 4 months apart. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a little better processing power than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 features a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 3200px resolution and a quite greater pixels number in each inch in the display. The Galaxy S20 shoots much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and videos in low-light situations and a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor and a lot better video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh.
The Galaxy S20 is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 4 XL, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.