Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-06 | -- |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.78 ounces | -- |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is much better than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), getting a 94.8 score against 82.2. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 has older 13 version while Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 14 version. Galaxy S20 features a much more vibrant screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a much higher display density.
The Galaxy S20 has a much more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S20 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.