Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-11-09 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is much better than the LG G7 Fit, getting a overall score of 94.8 against 77. Samsung Galaxy S20 is a a little bit heavier phone than LG G7 Fit, but both of them have the same thickness. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 has an older 13 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better processor than LG G7 Fit, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM memory. LG G7 Fit features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S20, although it has a little smaller screen, a quite lower resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a just a bit worse amount of pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S20 counts with better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a superior camera than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a back camera with much less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.