Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-07-02 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is much better than LG G8S ThinQ's global score of 82.5. The Samsung Galaxy S20 construction has the same thickness than LG G8S ThinQ, but it is just a little lighter. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has an older 13 version and LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy S20 counts with a bit faster CPU than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 counts with just a bit better display than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher pixel density and a better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution.
Galaxy S20 takes a bit better photos and videos than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and a back camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the Galaxy S20 also has a way better 7680x4320 video quality. LG G8S ThinQ counts with a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8S ThinQ also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S20 features a little better battery performance than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3550mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.