Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-11-23 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is a lot better than LG K52's 76 score. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 has a newer 13 version and LG K52 has Android 10 version, providing you lots of additional features. Although Galaxy S20 and the LG K52 were released only a couple months apart, Galaxy S20 is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a little bit better performance than LG K52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 has a lot better looking display than LG K52, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher pixels number per screen inch and a much better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 captures clearer videos and photos than LG K52, because although it has a way less megapixels camera in the back, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a little bit better storage for applications and games than LG K52, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The LG K52's battery performance is very similar to Galaxy S20's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.