Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is a lot better than the LG K62's overall score of 78.2. These phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has 13 version and LG K62 has Android 10, so it provides some additional features. Even when Samsung Galaxy S20 and LG K62 were released with only 9 months difference, Samsung Galaxy S20 is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner.
Galaxy S20 features a bit faster processing unit than LG K62, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM. The Galaxy S20 features an incredibly better display than LG K62, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a lot higher pixels density.
LG K62 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG K62 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG K62 has a battery lifetime that is very similar to the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy S20.
Samsung Galaxy S20 takes a bit better photographs and videos than LG K62, because although it has a lot worse resolution back-facing camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a bigger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.