Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is much better than LG Q70's 77.9 general score. Galaxy S20's construction is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than the LG Q70, even when both of them were released only 2 months apart. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 has newer 13 version and LG Q70 has Android 10, offering a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
The Galaxy S20 has a little faster CPU than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S20 has a more vivid screen than LG Q70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200.
The Galaxy S20 has slightly more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG Q70, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy S20 takes a bit better pictures and videos than LG Q70, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The LG Q70's battery duration is just as good as the Galaxy S20 one.
The Galaxy S20 is way more expensive than the LG Q70, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.