Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2015-10-01 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is way better than LG V10's general score of 78.6. The Galaxy S20 body is extremely newer, a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the LG V10. Both devices we compare here use Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1.
The LG V10 has a bit better looking display than Galaxy S20, although it has a little bit lower 2560 x 1440 resolution, a just a little lower quantity of pixels per inch of display and a little smaller screen. Galaxy S20 counts with a superior CPU than LG V10, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 7 more cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a slightly better camera than LG V10, because although it has a much lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also counts with a way better video definition and a lot larger sensor capturing much better quality photographs.
The Galaxy S20 features a bit more memory to store more apps and games than LG V10, because although it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has better battery duration than LG V10, because it has a 33 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V10. If you want to save some money, you can get the LG V10, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.