Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is much better than the LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 global score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 has 13 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo. Galaxy S20's design is newer, but a little bit heavier and a little thicker than LG V30S ThinQ.
The Galaxy S20 has a bit better processing power than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 also has 6 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S20 has a bit more vivid display than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a just a little greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the display and a bit bigger display.
Galaxy S20 counts with a slightly better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a camera in the back with way less mega pixels and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher video quality.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S20 counts with greater battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is a little more expensive than the LG V30S ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.