Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is better than the LG V35 ThinQ, with a 94.8 score against 81.3. Although the Galaxy S20 is newer than LG V35 ThinQ, it is just a little heavier and just a little thicker. The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a just a little better pixel density, a slightly better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a little larger screen.
Galaxy S20 counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3300mAh. The Galaxy S20 captures slightly better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photography and video and a camera with way less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a way higher video quality.
Although Galaxy S20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V35 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy S20, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V35 ThinQ, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.