Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is a bit better than the LG Velvet's 87.1 global score. Galaxy S20 is a a little bit lighter cellphone than the LG Velvet, but they are equally thin. Galaxy S20 features a slightly better looking display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a greater pixel density.
LG Velvet counts with a greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S20, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S20 has a little better hardware performance than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG Velvet features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking lower quality photos, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Velvet also counts with a camera with much more mega-pixels and better video frame rates.
The LG Velvet counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy S20, because it has an 8% larger battery size.
Although Galaxy S20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG Velvet, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Velvet. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy LG Velvet, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.