Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is a lot better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's overall score of 78.5. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S20 is way older and a bit thicker than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, it's body is still just a little lighter.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a display that's just as good as Galaxy S20's display, because although the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a way worse display pixel density and a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy S20 has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S20, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 7680x4320 video quality, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a way higher 50 MP resolution back facing camera, a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and photos and faster video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.