Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, having a 94.8 score against 80.9. The Samsung Galaxy S20 body is lighter and a little bit thinner than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, although it was released many years before. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 has a newer 13 version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12, so it provides you a couple additional features.
The Galaxy S20 has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a display that is just as good as the display in Samsung Galaxy S20, because although the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a way lower pixel number per display inch, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a very superior camera than Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with higher 30 fps video frame rate, a much better 200 MP resolution back facing camera and a much larger sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.