Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2023-09-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is way better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with a overall score of 94.8 against 77. Samsung Galaxy S20 is a a bit lighter phone than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but they have the same thickness. These phones work with the same Android 13 OS. The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S20, because although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a way worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a much higher 50 MP resolution camera, a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and higher 30 fps video frame rate.
Galaxy S20 counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S20 also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.