Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, having a overall score of 94.8 against 83.4. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S20 is notably older than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, it's construction is lighter and just a bit thinner. Both of these devices work with the same Android 13 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount. Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy S20, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality, a back-facing camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and higher 30 frames per second video frame rates.
Galaxy S20 counts with more memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy S20, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.