Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro's 86.3 score. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy S20 has 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version. Despite of the fact that Galaxy S20 is a lot older than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, it's construction is a little bit thinner and lighter.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy S20, because although it has way lesser pixels per inch of screen and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a larger sensor taking higher quality videos and photos, a lot bigger camera aperture, better video frame rates and a lot better 50 megapixels resolution camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S20, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy S20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.