Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, having a score of 94.8 against 87.1. The Galaxy S20 construction is lighter and just a bit thinner than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it was released many years before. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 has 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version.
Galaxy S20 has a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Both have 12 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy S20, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a much lower pixels count per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little larger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger aperture to capture better low light images, a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality photos and videos, a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S20, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy S20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.