Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 566 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is better than the Motorola Moto G 5G's 81.5 overall score. Despite of the fact that Galaxy S20 is older than the Motorola Moto G 5G, it's construction is way lighter and incredibly thinner. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 has a newer 13 version while Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10, so it counts with some additional features and enhanced performance.
Galaxy S20 features a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a higher pixels number in each inch in the display. The Galaxy S20 counts with a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Moto G 5G, and although they both have an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB, the Galaxy S20 also has 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has 8 GB more RAM. The Moto G 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G 5G also has a larger aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments, a camera with much more mega-pixels and better video frame rates.
The Moto G 5G counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.